The Internet today works much like a vast and rapidly expanding city. Every device — whether it’s your phone, laptop, or home router — needs a unique address to send and receive information. For decades, this addressing system depended on IPv4, a 32-bit structure that was perfectly adequate when the Internet was small.

However, as more people, devices, and services connected online, IPv4’s supply of addresses could no longer keep up with the growth. This shortage triggered the introduction of temporary workarounds and long-term solutions — the most significant being Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT) and IPv6.

Why CGNAT Emerged and Why It Still Matters

To extend the lifespan of IPv4, many Internet Service Providers (ISPs) adopted Carrier-Grade NAT. Instead of assigning every user a unique public IP address, CGNAT enables multiple customers to share a single IP. Each household receives a private internal address, and a translation layer maps internal traffic to the shared public IP.

This approach successfully delayed IPv4 exhaustion, but it introduced several limitations. CGNAT disrupts the Internet’s original end-to-end communication model by placing translation devices in the middle of user connections. As a consequence, certain applications struggle to function correctly, especially those that rely on direct connectivity.

Port forwarding becomes extremely difficult, sometimes impossible. This affects use cases such as home servers, online gaming, peer-to-peer applications, remote access setups, and more. Additionally, when multiple users share the same public IP, identifying the source of spam, abuse, or cyberattacks becomes far more complex. These challenges make CGNAT a useful but imperfect solution.

IPv6: The Scalable and Long-Term Answer

IPv6 was created as a permanent and future-proof alternative to IPv4. With its 128-bit address space, IPv6 provides an enormous pool of unique public addresses — enough for every device on Earth and many more.

Unlike CGNAT-based IPv4 setups, IPv6 supports true end-to-end connectivity. Every device can be globally reachable without relying on NAT layers or port mapping workarounds. This leads to cleaner network designs, lower complexity, improved reliability, and better performance for applications that require direct communication.

Despite its advantages, IPv6 adoption has been slower than expected. Many networks still run primarily on IPv4 infrastructure, and not all devices or applications fully support IPv6. In some cases, IPv6 is deployed using the same philosophies as IPv4 NAT, reducing the benefits of the protocol due to outdated design assumptions.

Practical Impact: How CGNAT and IPv6 Affect Everyday Users

The differences between CGNAT and IPv6 become clear when examining common real-world scenarios:

• Remote access and home servers:
  Under CGNAT, hosting or remotely accessing a device becomes extremely difficult. IPv6 simplifies this by giving each device a public address.
  
• Online gaming, VoIP, and video calls:
  NAT traversal often causes latency or connection issues. IPv6 removes the need for NAT, enabling more stable, low-latency connections.
  
• Smart home devices and IoT systems:
  IPv6 allows secure direct access without depending on complicated NAT relay mechanisms.
  
• Security investigations and abuse handling:
  CGNAT’s shared IP setup makes attribution harder. IPv6 allows clearer mapping between devices and activity, though it requires proper privacy controls.
  

In essence, CGNAT introduces friction for modern, interactive Internet use cases, while IPv6 aligns naturally with today’s connectivity needs.

Why IPv6 Adoption Is Still Incomplete

Migrating an entire global Internet ecosystem is complex. Several factors slow down IPv6 deployment:

• Legacy hardware and systems may lack IPv6 support.
  
• Some network engineers still design IPv6 with IPv4-style thinking, leading to unnecessary complexity.
  
• Upgrading ISP infrastructure requires financial investment, training, and long-term planning.
  
• Many online services still prioritize IPv4 due to familiarity and existing customer demand.
  

To move forward, ISPs must embrace native IPv6 routing instead of leaning on NAT-based stopgaps. Device manufacturers and service providers should treat IPv6 compatibility as mandatory, not optional. Developers and technical professionals need to adopt IPv6-first design principles to ensure smooth interoperability.

CGNAT Was a Temporary Fix — IPv6 Is the Path Forward

CGNAT has played an important role in extending the life of IPv4, but its limitations are increasingly apparent. It complicates connectivity, affects performance, reduces transparency, and restricts how users interact with the Internet.

IPv6, by contrast, provides scalability, efficiency, and true end-to-end communication — all essential for the modern digital ecosystem. While the transition is ongoing, IPv6 represents the Internet’s long-term foundation.

For users who rely on hosting, gaming, remote access, or advanced networking features, choosing an ISP that offers robust, native IPv6 routing can significantly improve their experience. For technology creators and providers, adopting IPv6-first development ensures long-term compatibility and reliability.

Ultimately, the future of the Internet is built on abundant addressing, simplified routing, and open connectivity — the principles that IPv6 was designed to deliver.

Jaze ISP Manager offers comprehensive solutions to help ISPs transition seamlessly to IPv6 with integration with all major BNG providers ensuring robust network performance and future-proof connectivity.

Click here to know more.